Comment: disappointing Wii coverage
On December 18th, 2008 by Chris Schilling
ÂÂ
I’ll be the first to admit that Wii hasn’t had the best year ever. Nintendo has tested large sections of its core fanbase this year - certainly in the last six months - with very few first-party titles which appealed to a non-casual audience. While Mario Kart Wii and Super Smash Bros. Brawl - among others - meant Wii got off to a great start this year, the fact that Animal Crossing was considered to be Nintendo’s big Christmas game for the hardcore gamers (at least, according to Reggie Fils-Aime it was) arguably showed the company was starting to get a little out of touch with that fanbase which had kept the faith during the GameCube years.
Yet while the Wii undoubtedly has more than its fair share of shovelware and disappointing multiformat ports, it’s become all too easy for videogame commentators to dismiss the Wii’s software line-up without even pausing to consider some titles which should be exempt from criticism - or, preferably, highlighted as bright spots amid a sea of casual-pleasing nonsense. Major websites are starting to perpetuate the myth that Wii has little compelling to offer core gamers, seemingly happy to ignore some well-crafted titles from third-parties. To paraphrase Edge (in their case discussing the ill-advised contempt for the PS3 from some quarters) this then breeds idiotic comments from the gurning cretins which populate the grubbier recesses of the internet. It’s little wonder that publishers struggle to sell their titles when the gaming press is happy to lazily fall back on sweeping generalisations. Some of these games don’t have a chance because it’s all too easy to play follow-the-leader and join in with the braying consensus of the internet ignorants.
What’s more disturbing is that it’s not just the fratboy witticisms of large corporate websites or fanboyish utterings from biased fanzines. Even places like Eurogamer - a site I hold in high regard - are starting to slip into this lazy hazing of Wii games. While Ellie Gibson’s round-up of some of the casual titles available this festive season is undoubtedly amusing in places, it’s become all too commonplace for Eurogamer to review the tat on the console while ignoring some far superior titles. So Goldenballs gets a 1/10 review while I still await EG’s opinion on Art Style CUBELLO and ROTOHEX, not to mention MySims Kingdom, while Wii versions of multiformat titles either get very short shrift or aren’t mentioned at all - for example, Call of Duty: World at War, reportedly a really quite accomplished port.ÂÂ
As I’ve previously mentioned, I’ve a lot of time for Chris Kohler, whose Game | Life blog for Wired.com I visit on a daily basis. Yet I was disappointed to read a post of his about Wii’s forthcoming schedule, where he ignores several potentially-interesting third-party titles to focus on the lack of fresh Wii content from Nintendo. Sure, there’s definitely a story in that, but it’s a shame that even quality journalists like Kohler fail to highlight the good stuff on its way in early 2009.
I don’t want people to turn into dribbling sycophants, happy to praise Nintendo even as it metaphorically kicks us in the teeth. I’m just calling for a little balance for a change. Wii might not be keeping everyone happy at the moment, but it’s hard to see things changing to any great degree if we all focus on the negatives and perpetuate this generalisation that there’s nothing to play. There are quality games out there - and it’s our responsibility as journalists to get the word out about them.
I like my cynicism with a side of occasional positivity is all. I don’t think that’s asking too much.ÂÂ






















































ÂÂ
ÂÂ
 
